The ideal generated by an irreducible polynomial is maximal
Dependencies:
- Irreducible polynomial
- q(x)F[x] is in p(x)F[x] iff p(x) divides q(x)
- p(x)F[x] = F[x] iff p is a non-zero constant
- A field is an integral domain
- Degree of product of polynomials
Let $F$ be a field. Let $p(x) \in F[x]-F$. Then $p(x)$ is irreducible iff $p(x)F[x]$ is a maximal ideal.
Proof
Part 1
\begin{align} & p(x) \textrm{ is reducible} \\ &\Rightarrow \exists q(x), r(x) \in F[x]-F, p(x) = q(x)r(x) \\ &\Rightarrow p(x)F[x] \subseteq q(x)F[x] \subseteq F[x] \end{align}
Since $q(x) \not\in F$, $q(x)F[x] \neq F[x]$. To prove that $p(x)F[x]$ is not a maximal ideal, we must prove that $p(x)F[x] \neq q(x)F[x]$.
$q(x), r(x) \in F[x] - F \Rightarrow (\deg(q) \ge 1 \wedge \deg(r) \ge 1)$ Since $F$ has no zero-divisors, $\deg(p) = \deg(q) + \deg(r)$. Therefore, $1 \le \deg(q) \le \deg(p)-1$.
Since $F$ has no zero-divisors, all non-zero polynomials in $p(x)F[x]$ have degree at least $\deg(p)$. Since $\deg(q) \le \deg(p)-1$, $q(x) \not\in p(x)F[x]$. Therefore, $q(x)F[x] \neq p(x)F[x]$. Therefore, $p(x)F[x]$ is not a maximal ideal.
Part 2
$p(x)F[x]$ is not a maximal ideal $\Rightarrow \exists q(x) \in F[x], p(x)F[x] \subsetneq q(x)F[x] \subsetneq F[x]$.
$q(x)F[x] \neq F[x] \Rightarrow q(x) \not\in F-\{0\}$.
$p(x)F[x] \subseteq q(x)F[x] \Rightarrow q(x) \mid p(x)$.
Let $p(x) = q(x)r(x)$. Since $F$ has no zero-divisors, $\deg(p) = \deg(q) + \deg(r)$. Since $p(x) \neq 0$, $q \neq 0$ and $r \neq 0 \Rightarrow \deg(r) \ge 0$. Therefore, $\deg(q) \le \deg(p)$.
If $\deg(p) = \deg(q)$, $\deg(r) = 0 \Rightarrow r \in F - \{0\}$. Since $q(x)f(x) = p(x)(f(x)r^{-1})$, $q(x)F[x] = p(x)F[x]$. This is a contradiction, since $p(x)F[x] \subsetneq q(x)F[x]$. Therefore, \[ \deg(p) \neq \deg(q) \Rightarrow \deg(q) \le \deg(p) -1 \Rightarrow \deg(r) \ge 1 \Rightarrow r \not\in F \]
Since $q(x), r(x) \in F[x]-F$ and $p(x) = q(x)r(x)$, $p(x)$ is reducible.
Dependency for: None
Info:
- Depth: 5
- Number of transitive dependencies: 14