Limit of a function at a point
Dependencies: None
$\newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon}$ Let $f: D \mapsto \mathbb{R}$ be a function, where $D \subseteq \mathbb{R}$.
Let $(b, c) \subseteq D$, where $b < c$. Then $\limsup_{x \to b} f(x)$ is defined as \[ \limsup_{x \to b} f(x) = C \iff \forall \eps > 0, \exists \delta > 0, \forall x \in (b, b + \delta], |f(x) - C| \le \eps. \] If no such $C$ exists, then $\limsup_{x \to b} f(x)$ is not defined. $\limsup_{x \to b}$ is also written as $\lim_{x \to b^+}$. It can be proven that if $\limsup$ exists, it is unique.
Let $(a, b) \subseteq D$, where $a < b$. Then $\liminf_{x \to b} f(x)$ is defined as \[ \liminf_{x \to b} f(x) = C \iff \forall \eps > 0, \exists \delta > 0, \forall x \in [b - \delta, b), |f(x) - C| \le \eps. \] If no such $C$ exists, then $\liminf_{x \to b} f(x)$ is not defined. $\liminf_{x \to b}$ is also written as $\lim_{x \to b^-}$. It can be proven that if $\liminf$ exists, it is unique.
Let $a \le b \le c$ and $a < c$ and $(a, c) - \{b\} \subseteq D$. Then \[ \lim_{x \to b} f(x) = C \iff \forall \eps > 0, \exists \delta > 0, (0 \le |x - b| \le \delta \implies |f(x) - C| \le \eps. \] If no such $C$ exists, then $\lim_{x \to b} f(x)$ is not defined. It can be proven that if $\lim$ exists, it is unique.
If $a < b < c$, and $(a, c) - \{b\} \subseteq D$, then it can be proven that $\lim_{x \to b} f(x) = C$ iff $\limsup_{x \to b} f(x) = \liminf_{x \to b} f(x) = C$.
$f$ is said to be continuous at $z$ iff $\lim_{x \to z} f(x) = f(z)$. $f$ is continuous on a set $S$ iff $f$ is continuous at $z$ for every $z \in S$.
Proof that if $\limsup$ exists, then it is unique
Let $(b, c) \subseteq D$, where $b < c$. Let $C_1$ and $C_2$ be two $\limsup$s, i.e., \[ \forall \eps > 0, \exists \delta > 0, \forall x \in (b, b + \delta], (|f(x) - C_1| \le \eps \textrm{ and } |f(x) - C_2|). \] But then $|C_1 - C_2| = |(f(x) - C_2) - (f(x) - C_1)| \le |f(x) - C_1| + |f(x) - C_2| \le 2\eps$, so $\eps \ge |C_1 - C_2|/2$, which contradicts the '$\forall \eps > 0$' part of the definition.
Proof that if $\liminf$ exists, then it is unique
Proof is analogous to that of $\limsup$.
Proof that if $\lim$ exists, then it is unique
Proof is analogous to that of $\limsup$.
Dependency for: None
Info:
- Depth: 0
- Number of transitive dependencies: 0